Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/March 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Today's featured article for March 6, 2025
Les Holden

Les Holden (6 March 1895 – 18 September 1932) was a fighter ace of World War I. He joined the Australian Light Horse in May 1915, serving in Egypt and France. In December 1916 he volunteered for the Australian Flying Corps and qualified as a pilot. As a member of No. 2 Squadron he gained the sobriquets "Lucky Les" and "the homing pigeon" after a series of incidents where he limped back to base in bullet-riddled aircraft. He was awarded the Military Cross, achieved five aerial victories, and finished the war as an instructor with No. 6 (Training) Squadron in England, earning the Air Force Cross. After leaving the Australian Flying Corps in 1919, he became a manager at Holden's Motor Body Builders. He joined the part-time Citizen Air Force before establishing an air service as a commercial pilot. In 1929, he located Charles Kingsford Smith and Charles Ulm in the north-west Australian desert after the pair were reported missing. He was killed in a passenger plane crash in Australia. (Full article...)

Picture of the day for March 6, 2025

The featured picture for this day has not yet been chosen.

In general, pictures of the day are scheduled in order of promotion to featured status. See Wikipedia:Picture of the day/Guidelines for full guidelines.

File:Tereshkova.jpg
The 70th birthday of the first woman in space.

This can be rotated in by replacing Dred Scott entry:



Removed:

Nothing about this in any of the linked articles. --mav 08:08, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)


Petru Groza

[edit]
Petru Groza
Petru Groza

A suggestion for next year:

-- PFHLai 19:04, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is it just my monitor, or does Image:Petru Groza joben.jpg look slightly blurry and out of focus. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 02:37, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the Dred Scott case

[edit]
Moved from WP:ERRORS

-- How did the Dred Scott case lead to Constitutional amendments? It didn't. It led to a similar judicial interpretation of Slavery until after the civil war, but it did not prompt amendments.Blaiseball 23:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2012 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 06:58, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2013 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 06:17, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2014 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 10:24, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2015 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 08:39, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2016 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 08:43, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2017 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 07:51, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2018 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 17:07, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2019 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 16:44, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2020 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 16:12, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2021 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 07:43, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2022 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 17:35, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]